简介
⚠️ 本期开头涉及性别暴力与虐待动物的讨论，请酌情收听。
为什么一个动物一旦被叫作「入侵物种」，牠的痛苦就好像突然不重要了？
本期《有点豆腐》从最近溢出海外的「虐杀清道夫」争议说起，聊聊一个在生态保护、网络流量和动物伦理之间不断滑动的问题：我们如何从「保护生态」走向了「观看虐杀」？又是如何把被人类带来、交易、放生、遗弃的动物，重新命名为需要被清除的敌人？节目从概念开始，试图解释「本土」、「外来」认知背后的二分法和具身体验。看似只是科学分类的词汇，却很容易进入一种战争化的叙事：外来物种变成入侵者，本土生态变成有边界的容器，人类成了替自然清剿敌人的守卫者。但真实的生态关系远比这个故事复杂。
物种的移动往往离不开贸易、养殖、消费、运输和市场，而所谓「入侵」的后果，也常常是人类制造出来的关系网络的一部分。这一期也会追问政治经济中的双重标准：为什么有些外来生命被包装成产业和美食，有些却被丢弃、猎奇和折磨？为什么当动物还有经济价值时，牠们是「良种」；一旦失去价值，就变成害兽和暴力奇观？最后，我们会进入最困难的伦理问题：当外来动物确实伤害本土动物时，我们如何在不同有感生命之间做选择？保护生态是否必然意味着杀戮？如果不得不干预，底线又在哪里？
这期节目不是打算全盘否定「入侵物种治理」，而是一次对治理语言、生态想象和暴力正当性的追问。我们需要保护生态和脆弱的生命，但也需要警惕：别让「保护」变成一种更体面的残忍。
音频
时间轴
00:18开场：跨物种与性别化的暴力04:34虐杀清道夫的视频溢出海外06:06积极新闻：玉林狗肉馆关停08:10为什么聊入侵物种10:45入侵物种是怎么定义的14:30「外来」与价值判断17:42流浪猫研究争议18:47入侵思维从何而来：意象图式21:27繁殖体压力 vs 生物抗性24:43十分之一规则与新生态系统（novel ecosystem）26:51政治经济：从西方引入的猪和鸡29:31从小龙虾到两栖动物的病原体迁移31:06伦理张力：整体主义 vs 个体主义36:21三个动物伦理框架对入侵物种的讨论42:12伦理共识：源头预防与非致命优先43:16同理心保育（Compassionate Conservation）与野生动物福祉评估46:15扑杀的伦理底线47:24殖民主义纯洁性的语法48:32自然的麦当劳化49:35酷儿生态学52:11下期预告
参考文献
入侵物种的定义、科学与认知框架
- Convention on Biological Diversity. (2002). Decision VI/23: Alien species that threaten ecosystems, habitats or species. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
- Davis, M. A., Chew, M. K., Hobbs, R. J., Lugo, A. E., Ewel, J. J., Vermeij, G. J., … Briggs, J. C. (2011). Don’t judge species on their origins. Nature, 474(7350), 153–154. doi.org
- IPBES. (2023). Thematic assessment report on invasive alien species and their control (H. E. Roy et al., Eds.). IPBES secretariat.
- Larson, B. M. H. (2011). Embodied realism and invasive species. In K. deLaplante, B. Brown, & K. A. Peacock (Eds.), Philosophy of ecology (Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 11, pp. 219–235). Elsevier/North-Holland.
- Li, Y., Wan, Y., Shen, H., Loss, S. R., Marra, P. P., & Li, Z. (2021). Estimates of wildlife killed by free-ranging cats in China. Biological Conservation, 253, Article 108929. doi.org
- Reo, N. J., & Ogden, L. A. (2018). Anishnaabe Aki: An indigenous perspective on the global threat of invasive species. Sustainability Science, 13(5), 1443–1452. doi.org
- Simberloff, D., et al. (2011). Non-natives: 141 scientists object. Nature, 475(7354), 36. doi.org
- Zhang, Z., Qi, H., & Guo, P. (2021). Doubtful estimates of wildlife killed by free-ranging cats in China. Biological Conservation, 253.
动物伦理：个体 / 整体、权利、关系
- Harrington, L. A., Moehrenschlager, A., Gelling, M., Atkinson, R. P. D., Hughes, J., & Macdonald, D. W. (2013). Conflicting and complementary ethics of animal welfare considerations in reintroductions. Conservation Biology, 27(3), 486–500. doi.org
- Korsgaard, C. M. (2018). Fellow creatures: Our obligations to the other animals. Oxford University Press.
- Regan, T. (2004). The case for animal rights (2nd ed.). University of California Press. (原作出版于 1983 年)
同理心保育与动物福祉
- Coghlan, S., & Cardilini, A. P. A. (2022). A critical review of the compassionate conservation debate. Conservation Biology, 36(1), Article e13760. doi.org
- Evans, T. R., … Mendl, M. (2026). Quantifying and categorising the animal welfare impacts caused by biological invasions [AWICIS]. Nature Communications. doi.org
- Hayward, M. W., Callen, A., Allen, B. L., … Wüster, W. (2019). Deconstructing compassionate conservation. Conservation Biology, 33(4), 760–768. doi.org
- Ramp, D., & Bekoff, M. (2015). Compassion as a practical and evolved ethic for conservation. BioScience, 65(3), 323–327. doi.org
- Wallach, A. D., Bekoff, M., Batavia, C., Nelson, M. P., & Ramp, D. (2018). Summoning compassion to address the challenges of conservation. Conservation Biology, 32(6), 1255–1265. doi.org
- Wallach, A. D., Batavia, C., Bekoff, M., … Ramp, D. (2020). Recognizing animal personhood in compassionate conservation. Conservation Biology, 34(5), 1097–1106. doi.org
纯洁性、殖民、酷儿生态学与科学论
- Hettinger, N. (2001). Exotic species, naturalization, and biological nativism. Environmental Values, 10(2), 193–224.
- Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
- Simha, A., & Subramaniam, B. (2026). Boundary violations and extinction phobias: Trans studies meets invasion science. Area, 58(1), Article e70046. doi.org
